Message from Singularics’ CEO August 22, 2009
Posted by Alex in : Corporate Communications , add a commentWe live in a non-linear universe.
This realization is not a new one. Physicists have long known that every electron in nature changes energy states by taking a non-linear “path” between the electron orbitals. Said another way, electrons change their energy state by disappearing from three dimensional existence and then instantaneously reappearing at a different point in space with a new energy level. This effect is known as Quantum Tunneling and it is actaully the basis of modern semiconductive electronic components such as diodes and transistors.
We see that Singularics’ own research into non-linear phenomenon is starting to point towards a potentially significant moment in the history of technology. It is a moment where humanity is taking its first steps in producing a new breed of devices which have profoundly interesting, useful and novel relationships to concepts like distance, impedance and time.
From the routine of our daily lives, perhaps it is easy to loose sight of the fact that our universe is an incredible mystery and that much remains yet unknown to us, but the pace of scientific progress is now accelerating exponentially. As a species we are beginning to draw connections never before realized and we must keep our sense of possibility honed if we are to proceed to the next step of technological advancement. At Singularics, we have taken some small but important pioneering steps in this new direction and we whole-heartedly welcome those with vision to join us.
Sincerely,
Alexander S. Petty
Chairman, President & CEO
Singularics Corporation
Singularics is out of the doghouse March 26, 2009
Posted by Jeff in : Corporate Communications, Uncategorized , 14commentsOn 2-25-09 Bruce Schneier placed the Singularics Corporation in the “doghouse” category on his personal website, a term to mean one is in trouble with the master. “Priceless,” was our claim and “snake oil” our game, or so he has assumed—and others quick to ride. Generally when new businesses are budding, brewing or just entering the murky waters of competitive fields they go unnoticed or are ignored completely, perhaps silently cheered by the few as underdogs but usually not. However, when a new company draws attention to itself in such a short period by making claims larger than perhaps the big dogs care to hear, hoping and urging that “this can all be safely ignored,” false accusations of fraud and other malevolence tends to dribble down from the top.
Thus, being co-founder and CTO of Singularics, I feel perhaps in a small part the responsible party for best explaining the factual value of our technology and the validity of the mathematics underlying it, being its primary engineer. This post is an honest response to the inaccurate criticism against us now slithering across the Internet.
What is not perfectly presented cannot be directly linked to fraud; it’s a marketing issue. We are not in the business of fraud, but perhaps have yet to master the art of marketing technologies where no market strategy groundwork has ever been laid. But we’re working on it. And what we have mastered, on the other hand, cannot be succinctly blogged about, as too much beauty and color is lost in such brief blog-bites. Yet, we are dedicated to the research and development of new technologies, particularly those that come about from our efforts to gain a better understanding of the complexities and phenomena of mathematical and physical singularities. No physicist nor mathematician alive today would argue that these areas of study are anything but difficult and idiosyncratic problems for scientists, much less the lay person. Science is a rigorous field where opinion has no real place; rather, such is a matter of Hypotheses, Experimentation and Conclusions—and that’s just the start.
With that said, the criticism presented has brought Singularics to a new awareness. As CTO, I have taken all Quality Assurance of Web Marketing Media under my wing. Up to this point there has been no QA of this content, and after reviewing it myself, I see that many points throughout the site do not fit with accurate technical fundamentals of the products. Again, this is a marketing issue and not a matter of fraud. Every page of the site has since been technically reviewed and corrections sent back to the content writer for address. Expect these changes in the coming week.
Singularics is not a scientific or mathematical think-tank; we are in the business of researching, developing and marketing new technology and products. While I do consider myself a scientist and mathematician, Singularics is not selling my science or mathematics, rather, my inventions. The reason why Singularics has drawn attention to my pre-print paper at all, “On Neutronic Functions and Undefined Figures in Prime Distribution” is for the sole purpose of providing insight to future readers of our patent-pending Neutronic Encryption Algorithm when it becomes public. See, there is no way to know for certain if an encryption algorithm is secure or not unless in-depth background behind the mathematics is provided to its users.
The paper has a few typos that have been found, which do lead to errors, but so far they are minor and easy to attend to; this is the purpose of releasing papers to pre-print before actual publication. And while the paper does contain two purported proofs of the Riemann Hypothesis, this is by second order only just to show what may or may not come to be of greater importance for future technology: the Neutronic Function and the Definitive Theorem. I say the purported proof is of second order because I am too well aware of the difficulties of getting new mathematical concepts accepted by the larger mathematics community. In fact, it was just this past year that Einstein’s e=mc^2 was mathematically “proven.” Surely, gaining acceptance cannot be on my agenda at all, else I’d get nothing truly important done. With that said, it is inevitable that these concepts will be used in years to come (with or without me), as they are mathematically sound and provide solutions to other problems without contradiction. How do I know? I know because I am developing new technology upon such concepts and the technology works just as the math predicts. Nature is not so slow in accepting new mathematical concepts; either it works or does not, and everything else is left to the universities to hammer out later.
In regards to RSA’s algorithm, there indeed is some cross-over it turns out, which has been written into the patent for background purposes. Have I personally factored large numbers identical to those produced from RSA’s algorithm using Neutronic Functions? Yes. Have I, or anyone else associated with Singularics factored any large bit keys commonly used in cryptography today? No. What the Neutronic Function can do, however, is calculate the first handful of digits of the primes instantaneously in isolation no matter how large the number is. To RSA’s or our knowledge, this has not been done before and it is difficult to determine what sort of impact this will have on mathematics and/or security when expert mathematicians have a go at it. What the Neutronic Function also does is isolate regions where numbers either exist or do not exist, and it does this in absolution; it is not an approximation or guess. It just is. While my personal efforts have not reached the point of completely “cracking” the large number factorization issue instantaneously, it has come really close and is progressing daily. It’s only a matter of time and dedication when it will be fulfilled either by me or someone else, as the Neutronic Function and Definitive Theorem comes to land on common ground. And when that moment does come, Singularics and I already have an excellent solution to this matter. We refer to it as “Arbitrary Line Encryption” and the Neutronic Encryption Algorithm (NEA) is an example. Such an arbitrary line takes away any power from the Neutronic Function by 1) using floating-point values and 2) hiding the decimal placement of the lines and keys from the Neutronic Function and therefore the public.
Is it possible to break the NEA? Perhaps. Anything is possible. However, you would have no way to confirm or deny whether you are making progress or even if you have solved it in the end. It would be like pointing a telescope at the stars to see if there may be life when there’s no lens even in the scope.
I will be happy to address any questions, mathematical or not, right here in the comments section.
Jeffrey N. Cook